Subject: Re: encrypted swap?
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/10/2001 14:56:22
In article <20010610034140.846DB1E4FB@thoreau.thistledown.com.au>,
Simon Burge <email@example.com> wrote:
>Here's a cut at adding -o foo=bar support to getmntopts(), by adding a
>MOPT_ASSIGNMENT flag. Two things:
> - I've changed the m_inverse member to be a m_flags, that
> has options for a negative flag (eg, "nodev") so that
> existing code doesn't need to change (but I'll change
> all the "1"s to MOPT_NEGATIVE if I take this further).
I don't really like having m_flag and m_flags in the same struct;
I find it confusing.
Also why all the de-constification?