On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 jchacon@genuity.net wrote:

> How hard would it be to not have 1 buffer (which gets destroyed on VT
> switch) and instead keep a running buffer per VT?
> 
> This allows people to switch at will but scroll back if something was running
> they need to look at.

I think that was one of the things Paolo Losi was working on.

Take care,

Bill