Subject: Re: adding to machine_spec in config(8)
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: David Querbach <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/17/2001 14:07:41
> Why limit it to two additional names? Why not accept a (more or less)
> arbitrary number of them, from zero upwards?
In my opinion, the PowerPC architecture needs three levels right now, with
perhaps more in the future:
machine: prep, ofppc, macppc, amigappc, mpc8xx, mpc82xx
sub-arch: 60x, 40x/8xx
Files in the sub-arch would include at least pmap.* and pte.*, which need to
vary dramatically between PowerPC families. For instance, the Motorola
MPC8xx family uses a completely different MMU from the 60x devices, but many
other parts of the architecture are identical.
While these variations could be handled with #ifdefs, I really believe that
when entire subsystems are involved, the method of configuration should be
by inclusion/exclusion of entire source files.
Overall, my preference would be for a somewhat richer structure in sys/arch
to reduce the amount of duplicated and conditional machine-dependent code.
Real-Time Systems Inc.