Subject: Re: struct emul modification
To: None <>
From: Christos Zoulas <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 05/17/2001 20:22:29
In article <>,
Jarommr Dolecek <> wrote:
>Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>> I already asked here is nobody was against moving e_flags outside of the
>> __HAS_MINIMAL_EMUL ifdef in struct emul. I had no answer. Shall I assume
>> anyone is okay with this?
>Well, generally, other solution would be preferable. Wouldn't it
>be possible to add come completely compat/linux specific code
>to catch the signal and do not actually post it to Linux process
>if the descriptor is a pipe? I'd hate to add some stuff which
>would become obsolete the moment newpipe would go in.

Actually we would want to implement SIGIO for newpipe.