On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 02:01:09AM -0700, Todd Whitesel wrote:

 > Does this enable any time-complexity reductions in code that runs at splvm()
 > (or will be), as a result of a better understanding of what's really going on?

Not really -- we already understood what was going on wrt. splvm().  And
splimp()'s use was pretty well understood by people who had their heads
wrapped around the issue.

-- 
        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>