Subject: Re: Any resolution for LKM issues?
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <email@example.com>
From: Darren Reed <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/18/2001 01:47:36
In some email I received from Ignatios Souvatzis, sie wrote:
> One problem though: this only works for base kernel calls... inter-LKM calls
> will still potentially need long branches.
At present it is only possible for one-way dependencies to exist for LKM
calls. When you do that, you need to supply a complete new symbol table,
not that for the kernel, so I can't see why the inter-LKM calls would be
treated in a special way by the loader.