Subject: Re: nfsd: locking botch in op %d
To: Bill Studenmund <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/13/2001 16:08:44
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 02:29:05PM -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:

 > That actually is the other way to fix the problem, though with doing this
 > the vput really should be a vrele() (since otherwise you're implicitly
 > relying on specfs using the nolock routines :-)

Is there any reason to keep using the "nolock" routines?  Well, a few
things still use them.  But it seems like you want locking on e.g. spec
nodes, right?

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>