Subject: Re: Syscalls [was Re: Support for ACLs]
To: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Todd Vierling <email@example.com>
Date: 03/11/2001 10:22:17
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Greywolf wrote:
: # Why bother? Are syscall numbers a scarce resource?
: No, but it's cruft, along with stat43 and stat12.
Although when the stuff is not in the kernel, the syscall slots simply have
a NULL in the entry. That is a waste of space, but the waste is on the
order of (a few dozen) * sizeof(void *)--rather negligible in context.
: Is there seriously stuff out there for which a binary exists without source
: that needs to keep backwards binary compatibility?
There's more than enough, yes; sometimes "without source" simply means "lost
source". But that's why you get the ability to turn off the compat
subsystems if you don't need them. 8-)
-- Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org> * Wasabi NetBSD: Run with it.
-- NetBSD 1.5 now available on CD-ROM -- http://www.wasabisystems.com/