Subject: Re: ARM port organisation (was: Re: NetBSD/hpcarm snap code)
To: Ben Harris <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 02/17/2001 10:10:50
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 05:59:12PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:

 > > They're not on-chip on the other machines that have them, tho, right?
 > True.  On the other hand, as far as I can tell you'd put the Footbridge
 > code under sys/arch/arm, and doesn't that do much the same as the IOMD
 > (interrupt handling, address decoding etc)?

Okay, so maybe sys/arch/arm/iomd is appropriate for that driver and its
device attachments.  (I guess the IOMD is core logic, then?)

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>