Subject: Re: ARM port organisation (was: Re: NetBSD/hpcarm snap code)
To: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 02/17/2001 10:10:50
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 05:59:12PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:
> > They're not on-chip on the other machines that have them, tho, right?
> True. On the other hand, as far as I can tell you'd put the Footbridge
> code under sys/arch/arm, and doesn't that do much the same as the IOMD
> (interrupt handling, address decoding etc)?
Okay, so maybe sys/arch/arm/iomd is appropriate for that driver and its
device attachments. (I guess the IOMD is core logic, then?)
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>