Subject: Re: NetBSD/hpcarm snap code
To: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 02/16/2001 11:19:02
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 07:05:44PM +0000, Ben Harris wrote:
> > There are many more ARM boards in existance than the CATS that use
> > Footbridge, eh?
> Yes, but are they otherwise sufficiently different from the CATS as to
> justify their own MACHINE?
Possibly, yes. They may boot completely differently, for example.
> That sounds reasonable, but it does tend towards recreating quite a lot of
> sys/arch/arm32 (and sys/arch/arm26 for that matter) under
> sys/arch/arm. This may not be a bad thing.
Uh, arch/arm32 and arch/arm26 should probably go away in favor of arch/arm,
and the rename I suggested happen.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>