Subject: Re: NetBSD/hpcarm snap code
To: Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <email@example.com>
Date: 02/16/2001 11:13:01
Ben Harris <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On 16 Feb 2001, Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> > email@example.com (Ben Harris) writes:
> > > They're more equivalent to the IOMD or Footbridge, whose support
> > > code would presumably live in the riscpc and cats directories
> > > respectively.
> > IOMD may be RPC-specific, but Footbridge support, in a correct world,
> > shouldn't be CATS specific.
> > There are many more ARM boards in existance than the CATS that use
> > Footbridge, eh?
> Yes, but are they otherwise sufficiently different from the CATS as to
> justify their own MACHINE?
I dunno. It may be a matter of firmware.
If not, the CATS port would be misnamed, if it were 'arch/cats' or
similar that indicated that it was specific to CATS. 8-)