Subject: Re: More Device Properties
To: Ben Harris <email@example.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/14/2001 12:01:00
email@example.com (Ben Harris) writes:
> It's already been suggested that we should add an int *dv_loc to struct
> device, which would be a lighter-weight way of doing this.
That's actually insufficient on several grounds:
(1) what are the naems of these bloody things? I suppose you could
also point to the 'locnames' from the 'struct cfdriver' of the parent
bus... but it makes for a bit of a mess.
(2) it doesn't handle non-integer locators.
There are several aspects of (2):
(a) what if your locators are integral values but don't fit into
'int'. e.g. they're 64-bit bit pointers. (or >32-bit pointers.)
It's a reasonable concern; lots of machines have >32-bit physical
(b) what if your locator really isn't number at all. e.g. it's a
long-standing deficiency in the existing framework that you can't use
e.g. strings as locators. (this might be desirable e.g. to match
PCMCIA cards, etc.)