Subject: Re: cosmetic fix to kdump for RET from EMUL "linux" (long)
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/02/2001 02:28:58
In article <200102010951.f119pPZ00799@saruman.ics.muni.cz>,
Jarommr Dolecek <email@example.com> wrote:
>Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>> I made a rather complete fix, but I'm not sure it's The Right Way. Any
>> opinion on the following patch?
>Well, I don't like this too much. I really think that the kernel
>sources should be adjusted to not write the RET record for
what about ERESTART? does userland ever see it?