matthew green wrote:
   > i dunno, i don't agree with this.  i can imagine a situation when you send
   > someone else an LKM with new ddb commands. or you're trying to debug a
   > system you don't want to reboot and you're already using DDB heavily for
   > debugging.  i can think of more reasons it might be valid.
   
   OK, so having the ability to add new DDB commands via LKM would probably be
   handy sometimes. But is there a need to replace existing DDB commands ? That's
   what we talk about.


is there a real need to remove the ability?  i really like the const
work you've been doing, and hope you continue through out more of the
kernel, but only if it doesn't sacrifice anything ...


.mrg.