>> for some codepoint japanese/chinese/tiwanese/korean glyphs are
>> different, and it is the very problem why many of people do not
>> advocate Unicode and prefer iso-2022.
>You mean that they are the same but printed slightly different in the
>different languages? If so, is the difference greater than what you'd
>get from using different `fonts' (I assume that the font concept
>exists in printed kanji)?

	yes, the difference is greater than that.

itojun