itojun@iijlab.net writes:

> for some codepoint japanese/chinese/tiwanese/korean glyphs are
> different, and it is the very problem why many of people do not
> advocate Unicode and prefer iso-2022.

You mean that they are the same but printed slightly different in the
different languages? If so, is the difference greater than what you'd
get from using different `fonts' (I assume that the font concept
exists in printed kanji)?

Just being curious here.

/Johan