Subject: Re: ISDN subsystem
To: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-kern
Date: 01/03/2001 11:33:16
--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 02:05:54PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > 	i have never looked into ISDN4BSD code and not sure if it is the
> > 	right thing...  how about sys/netisdn (like sys/netnatm)?
>=20
> It's not only a network transport layer (think of the answering machine),
> but in some technical sense of course it is. I don't know why, but I realy
> like sys/isdn ;-)

Well, same reasoning applies to ATM.=20

The telephone network is a network, too, that provides world area point to
point connections. For the sake of symmetry, I'd use sys/netisdn.

Regards,
	Ignatios

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBOlL/6DCn4om+4LhpAQE6ygf/aXu3FYAXU2ATRRBMxYbA5ER2wz825rtb
oCfVCBVYmNl1TgTNdbx09KkNLTzFX+R1LKGECKa+bevHIASDRwmm/rS3tqvxrhRX
M7H6/2OZ5QAam6ccrkRnMpaqf8xtDDhGY9Ya65/ZzV2VxXc458otRF8MjNftqyz6
xGiB50dv5h4BpqRYs8lwqoC0xSzrct0CEb53gqG+RQo1WfLESCwsmv7UxFgy/1vY
okCAyzsA05trbC9fdXVruzjtpNrsaZdZb1LvNRvyGQ4H5nHogzlBcQ6TaGrUW/G5
TZ6uiQC6gt4D6rmEoqzIUvB72JSLxo3D069JV5unquS8punJz/H5CA==
=kDiX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--k1lZvvs/B4yU6o8G--