Subject: Re: new sysctl: hw.cpu_isa
To: None <>
From: Simon Burge <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/27/2000 21:12:17
Just to revisit this (because I still have a heap of patches in my
source tree), it seems like a hw.cpu_isa sysctl _isn't_ a preferred way
of selecting shared libraries at least on some architectures.  Is the
sysctl itself useful to keep for any other reasons, or shall I just toss
the whole lot into the bit bucket?

Simon Burge                            <>
NetBSD Sales, Support and Service: