Subject: Re: replace kernel random number function
To: None <>
From: Simon Burge <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/24/2000 00:41:35 wrote:

> 	deraadt told me that i should not replace random(9), as there can be
> 	some code depending on poorness, or uniformity, of random(9).

???  Can you/he point to some examples of this?  Sounds a little bit
suspect to me...

Simon Burge                            <>
NetBSD Sales, Support and Service: