itojun@iijlab.net wrote:

> 	deraadt told me that i should not replace random(9), as there can be
> 	some code depending on poorness, or uniformity, of random(9).

???  Can you/he point to some examples of this?  Sounds a little bit
suspect to me...

Simon.
--
Simon Burge                            <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Sales, Support and Service:  http://www.wasabisystems.com/