On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 12:41:35AM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
> 
> > 	deraadt told me that i should not replace random(9), as there can be
> > 	some code depending on poorness, or uniformity, of random(9).
> 
> ???  Can you/he point to some examples of this?  Sounds a little bit
> suspect to me...

Who _does_ call random(9), anyway? (Other than tcp isn generation?)

	-is

-- 
 * Progress (n.): The process through which Usenet has evolved from
   smart people in front of dumb terminals to dumb people in front of
   smart terminals.  -- obs@burnout.demon.co.uk (obscurity)