Subject: Re: bus_space and barriers
To: (Chris G. Demetriou) <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Witold J. Wnuk <email@example.com>
Date: 10/21/2000 00:39:55
On 20-Oct-00, 22:18:09 Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> It is meant to provide programmers a portable, potentially-efficient
> mechanism for machine-independent device access.
Portatibility is just realization of what I meant by b) (easy to use)
and c) (helps to manage code). It does did by not requiring programmer
to write multiple code or care about machine dependencies.
> Part of that
> includes defining requirements for programmers which are, in fact,
> portable and capable of efficiency.
Yes. That is the question: Where to draw the line between programmers
luxury and efficiency.
Witold J. Wnuk
PS: Sorry again for my english. I know that I am sometimes hard to
understand. I'm working at it.