Subject: Re: Proposal: In-kernel loader + symbol table handler.
To: Anders Magnusson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 10/20/2000 08:07:26
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:19:40AM +0200, Anders Magnusson wrote:
> > Will we still have the option of statically configuring/loading
> > a kernel?
> For sure YES!
Ragge -- I like your proposal ... but is it necessary for the kernel
linker to always run as a kernel process? Can't it just use the
context of whatever is cauing the module to be loaded, e.g. the modload
program or whatever?
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>