Subject: Re: Proposal: In-kernel loader + symbol table handler.
To: Anders Magnusson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greywolf <email@example.com>
Date: 10/19/2000 14:54:41
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Anders Magnusson wrote:
# Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 23:45:44 +0200 (MET DST)
# From: Anders Magnusson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
# To: email@example.com
# Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
# Subject: Proposal: In-kernel loader + symbol table handler.
# The current kernel module system is quite bad. It lacks many of the
# features that are needed to do something useful with it.
# To add full functionality that makes it possible to have a complete
# dynamic linked kernel. How this will work and its implications will be
# described in a special paper.
Will this dynamic loading perform better than the excuse that Solamis
uses (especially on the SPARC)?
Will we still have the option of statically configuring/loading
[If we don't wish to repel users, one or both questions need to be
answered with a definite "yes". Preferably both of them.]
*BSD: Agnostics in the Platform Religious Wars.