In <Pine.SOL.4.21.0010151618410.24769-100000@libra.cus.cam.ac.uk>
bjh21@netbsd.org wrote:

> > I didn't notice this file, but shouldn't this be somewhere else ?
> > Maybe we need a sys/dev/upc ?
> > sys/dev/ic should only have bus-independant code.

> I think that depends on how you define "bus".  The upc driver is for a
> single chip of the usual PC super-IO variety, and calling it a bus seems
> over the top.  Do we really want a separate subdirectory for every
> multi-function chip that might be attached to more than one bus?  

> It's notable that there is at least one other device that follows the same
> pattern -- the depca device has an "le" built into it, but still warrants
> a place in dev/ic.

Ok, I see. I notice "puc" at pci also has com/lpt children
and the files are in sys/dev/pci.

But I think it might cause some confusion that
both wdc.c and wdc_upc.c (and com/lpt etc.) exist
in the same directory. How about sys/dev/ic/upc/ ?
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp