Subject: Re: CVS commit: syssrc
To: Manuel Bouyer <>
From: Ben Harris <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/15/2000 16:23:31
[ Moving to tech-kern: that's where this belongs ]

On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 02:46:00AM +0300, Ben Harris wrote:
> > 
> > Module Name:	syssrc
> > Committed By:	bjh21
> > Date:		Sat Oct 14 23:45:59 UTC 2000
> > 
> > Modified Files:
> > 	syssrc/sys/dev/ic: wdc_upc.c
> > 
> > Log Message:
> > Shuffle printfs around so they look right when we've got a drive attached.
> I didn't notice this file, but shouldn't this be somewhere else ?
> Maybe we need a sys/dev/upc ?
> sys/dev/ic should only have bus-independant code.

I think that depends on how you define "bus".  The upc driver is for a
single chip of the usual PC super-IO variety, and calling it a bus seems
over the top.  Do we really want a separate subdirectory for every
multi-function chip that might be attached to more than one bus?  

If it would help, I could move all the code into upc.c -- the only reason
it's not there already is that I didn't know how to do the preprocessor  
conditionals for this, and I do now.

It's notable that there is at least one other device that follows the same
pattern -- the depca device has an "le" built into it, but still warrants
a place in dev/ic.

Ben Harris                                                   <>
Portmaster, NetBSD/arm26               <URL:>