Subject: Re: TAILQ_FOREACH_REVERSE et al (PR 11117)
To: enami tsugutomo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: None <email@example.com>
Date: 10/04/2000 03:35:59
enami tsugutomo <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> email@example.com writes:
> > Here's my proposed patch to queue.h. I did test this by building a
> > kernel and cmp:ing all the object files. Any comments/objections?
> I don't think this improves readability.
The reason that I had for doing this was the broken
TAILQ_FOREACH_REVERSE. To my mind, it was much easier to see that it
was broken with the macro-ized version.