Subject: Re: bufpages calculation
To: Chuck McManis <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/27/2000 07:39:03
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Chuck McManis wrote:
> >On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> > > ... back in the days where 4MB of memory was the norm...
> At 07:11 PM 9/26/00 +0100, David Brownlee wrote:
> > But kernels were much smaller then.
> Hello tech-kern,
> Not to pick on Bill or David here, but one of the nice things about NetBSD
> (vs everything else out there) is that it is wonderfully cross platform.
> Hence I get a bit worried when systems with 4MB are looked upon fondly as
> ancient relics. When I contemplate deploying systems _today_ that have 4MB
> or less of main memory. I don't like to hear, "A 2MB system is too small to
> support UNIX." when certainly versions of UNIX have and do run on such
> systems (even PDP-11's for heavens sake!)
> This is a very distinguishing factor that certainly the Linux community has
> embraced (only used as an example of another group where cross platform is
> a stated goal) and we should keep it in mind as well. Sure 64MB Pentium
> systems are about $30 at GoodWill but the world isn't defined by such things.
You clipped the part where I mentioned I was trying to help the
low memory case :) If you think 4MB on a vax is low, try it on
an arm26 box - RISC instruction set and a 32K hardware pagesize.
We are still very much interested in supporting low memory
machines - Frank has just modified the install setup to help
4MB i386 boxes which should be applicable to other architectures,
Ben has added an NFS_V2_ONLY option to exclude NFS3 and NQNFS
code, and Jason added VNODE_OP_NOINLINE to avoid inlining vnode op
Howver its inevitable that NetBSD kernels are larger than BSD4.X -
there is a lot more functionality and hardware support knocking
around in there - so even using BSD4.X rules for bufpages
calculation we should be allowing fewer buffers on low memory
-- www.netbsd.org: A pmap for every occasion --