Subject: Re: 1.5ALPHA_2 i386 panic in suspendsched()
To: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: enami tsugutomo <email@example.com>
Date: 09/18/2000 12:59:20
Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Going this way, I guess the run queue locking could happen later too.
BTW, why suspendsched() is necessary to traverse run queues? I think
it is enough to remove from run queue when traversing allprocs if it
is on a queue. At least, it is bad that processes runnable but
swapped out are left runnable after suspendsched().