Ken Hornstein wrote:

> >Comments?  Thoughts?
>
> I had looked at this for a while some time ago.  It really seemed to me
> that the "right" thing to do was to put things like IrLAP and IrLMP
> into the kernel (since those are the "per interface" things) and have
> userland programs create a PF_IRDA_LMP socket (or whatever you wanted
> to call it).

Yes, that's certainly a viable alternative.


> BTW, what's IrMUX?

Maybe that's not what it's called.  I've not the one who's been reading the
IrDA specs.  The IrDA multiplex layer.  Is it IrLMP?


--

        -- Lennart