Subject: Re: Replacing the sysctl() interface.
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/06/2000 11:39:20
[ On Monday, June 5, 2000 at 09:28:24 (-0400), Greg Hudson wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Replacing the sysctl() interface.
> Not really. The Unix philosophy is that most shared data objects are
> files (although some objects are not, like unnamed pipes). Using file
> data as a control channel is a relatively new innovation and has a
> very different feel to it.
True enough, at least unless you include the ioctl() interface. Though
there are relatively few shell-programmable interfaces to ioctl(), they
do exist; and of course there are almost no common shell-level tools
that can do their own ioctl()s.
> NetBSD has traditionally resisted this
> innovation, perhaps for good reason.
Interestingly 4.4BSD doesn't seem to have resisted this innovation, and
certainly FreeBSD has taken it further without as much resistance. ;-)
NetBSD has also made more use of it recently too.
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098 VE3TCP <email@example.com> <robohack!woods>
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Secrets of the Weird <email@example.com>