On Sun Jun  4 17:29:42 2000, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
[..]
> What you should do is add a __clone(2) to the NetBSD C library; we already
> have all the support for it in the kernel, and there's precedent for it
> (Linux).  (Editorial note: calling it rfork(2) would be wrong, since the
> semantics needed would be incompatible with the original rfork(2) from
> Plan 9.)

I though we don't want this interface in our C library.
At least not with the current implementation.

Bernd