Subject: Re: Replacing the sysctl() interface.
To: Darren Reed <email@example.com>
From: Hubert Feyrer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/05/2000 15:14:26
On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, Darren Reed wrote:
> > Sounds like a file system. How about removing sysctl() altogether, and
> > putting everything under kernfs as a file?
Sounds like a good idea.
Handling data in/from a filesystem seems to be better understood/easier
than via some new interface.
Plus it follows the traditional Unix "everything is a file" philosophy.
NetBSD - because Unix isn't just #include <linux.h>, i386, ILP32, ELF, ...!