Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

> >  + On a mostly idle 256HZ 32-bit machine (eg pmax), the CP_IDLE
> >    counter will overflow in approx 100 days.
> >  + In a compat32 situation on a 64 bit kernel the results of a
> >    userland program reading cp_time will be bogus.
> > 
> > Any reasons not to do this?
> 
> Presumably you'll move the cp_time sysctl to a new mib slot when you
> do this?

That's a good question. :-)  I was sorta hoping maybe to re-use the
current mib number and put this under the "-current is sometimes broken"
category since the current sysctl is only two or three days old...

Simon.