Subject: lchflags(2)?
To: None <>
From: matthew green <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 04/16/2000 14:25:26
i've implemented an lchflags(2) (that does not follow symlinks, and
can thus operate on symlinks).  it appears to work just fine.  however
the chflags(1) man page claims that symlinks don't have flags?

chflags(1) itself will need some updating, but does anyone object to
this new system call?