Subject: Re: swapfs and uvm.
To: Simon Burge <email@example.com>
From: Eduardo E. Horvath <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/14/2000 11:09:44
> * I was thinking of using a really simple filesystem layout with a
> dynamic number of inodes. No fragments, everything is allocated in
> pagesize chunks. Some rough scribblings on a notepad are geared to a
> 4GB maximum size (page offsets, file sizes) - would this be a problem
> in the real world?
Since swap is usually much tighter on space than a standard filesystem
I would expect that fragments, or more of a malloc()-like scheme would
be more relevent to a /tmp filesystem.
Eduardo Horvath email@example.com
"I need to find a pithy new quote." -- me