Subject: Re: driver for webgear aviator 2.4 card
To: Christian E. Hopps <email@example.com>
From: John Hayward <John.C.Hayward@wheaton.edu>
Date: 01/25/2000 11:11:08
I looked up the stuff on webgear's home page and it seems that the
PRO has a "base unit" which looks like it connects via network to a
computer and and remote units. The aviator 2.4 does not.
I looked up what CompUSA had on their web page and they indicated
WebGear Aviator Pro but the graphic was of an Aviator 2.4
After wasting over 1 hour at one CompUSA store last night and interacting
with 5 sales persons who could not find the unit I went out this morning
to a different CompUSA store and picked up the Aviator 2.4 unit - they had
no Aviator Pro which is what they had on the web.
The box had marked out the number of isa cards and written in a 2 - it
seems the box was printed with only 1 isa card but I should be getting
Will test things out this evening to see if the unit works - I'm keeping
my sale slip just in case.
On 24 Jan 2000, Christian E. Hopps wrote:
> Date: 24 Jan 2000 18:57:38 -0500
> From: Christian E. Hopps <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Atsushi Onoe <email@example.com>
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
> email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
> Subject: Re: driver for webgear aviator 2.4 card
> Atsushi Onoe <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Apparently, 2.4 and PRO are identical hardware. Differences are software,
> > > as I understand it. It may be firmare, driver software, or a combination
> > > of the two.
> > I found a description about the difference in
> > http://www.world.std.com/~corey/raylink.html
> > According to the page, 2.4 supports adhoc mode and PRO supports
> > infrastructure mode (only?).
> I didn't find that conclusve at all. He said they were the same HW, but
> just ``setup differently''. The key here is what ``setup differently''
> means. I'm going to send another to Corey.