Subject: Re: Time to update KNF?
To: Greywolf <email@example.com>
From: Ted Lemon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/20/2000 04:43:05
> It's possible to reach a readable medium
> which isn't quite as terse as cfe(prs) without being quite so blathering
> as check_for_error(current_parse).
True. However, in a complicated program, you still wind up with
three-word function names even if you write errcheck and not
> Equally, I think I'd puke if braces were always on the subsequent line
> AND indented. One or the other, but not both.
Don't ever look at any GNU code, then - I was copying the GNU coding
> Sorry if this is a waste of bandwidth, but I hardly think that
> it's out of vogue in this thread to state one's opinion, however
> unpopular it may seem.
Obviously not, and it's not clear to me that my opinion is more
popular than yours. :')