Subject: Re: uvm & flushing
To: Matthew Jacob <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 12/15/1999 08:41:19
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> This is not necessarily a given. Nothing is cast in concrete that MSS3a
> *has* to be wired to the 1.4.X stream. We do tend to say this internally
> in the storage-devel group, if only to limit the usual wankage of:
> 1. problem?
> 2. update to -current first!
> 3. (two weeks of merging). Goto #1.
> If there's a showstopper technical reason that is impractical to get
> around, resync'ing with 1.5 may be better. And this complete spasm
> occurred a year ago wrt 1.3 as well.
Very true. But even then we won't have UBC, since it'll be a post-1.5