Subject: Re: fsck superfluous w/ softdep?
To: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Sean Doran <smd@ebone.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/28/1999 05:44:15
der Mouse  <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> writes:

> Trashing fsck would amount to saying that the only way filesystems can
> be corrupted is through unclean shutdowns

Not to mention the implicit assumption -- even if we trash
only fsck_ffs -- that all filesystems mounted by a
NetBSD-current machine are using soft dependencies.

        Sean.