Subject: Re: itimer, pthreads, and checkpointing
To: Charles M. Hannum <root@ihack.net>
From: Michael Graff <explorer@flame.org>
List: tech-kern
Date: 11/22/1999 13:55:25
root@ihack.net (Charles M. Hannum) writes:

> If we're going to go with an interim interface that we expect to
> deprecate anyway, it makes more sense (if applicable) to use a fixed
> number of signals and just statically allocate them.  They can just be
> changed to POSIX `realtime' signals later; no need to change any APIs.

Agreed.  Can I start committing code then?  :)

--Michael