On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 13:19:06 -0800 (PST) 
 Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> wrote:

 > I would think XS_SELTIMEOUT is XS_SELTIMEOUT (or whatever Jason has
 > renamed it to) no matter how you get there, whether it be from the plain
 > 250ms nominal selection timeout or via a watchdog that comes along 2ms
 > later and notices this wedged condition.
 > 
 > That is, if I've understood you correctly....

XS_SELTIMEOUT is for "selection timeouts", i.e. selection didn't complete.

...so, adjust my previous reply as necessary (x/XS_TIMEOUT/XS_SELTIMEOUT).

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>