Subject: Re: UBC status
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Chuck Silvers <email@example.com>
Date: 09/30/1999 19:59:36
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 09:59:02AM -0700, Eduardo E. Horvath wrote:
> <Silly idea mode>
> What if we always keep buffer-cache pages on the inactive list (unless
> dirty, I suppose). If they are accessed, move them to the end of the
> list, but don't migrate them to the active list. Then buffer cache pages
> would have a higher rate of re-use than other pages.
> </Silly idea mode>
a page being on the inactive list implies that it has no pmap mappings,
which isn't really want you want for cached regular file data. or by
"buffer-cache pages" do you mean just metadata, which is all that will
be in the buffer cache in the post-UBC world?
furthermore, the inactive list wants to contain at most 1/3 of RAM,
but we'd like to allow using nearly all of RAM for cached file data
in the case where the demand for other types of pages is low.