Subject: Re: renaming /boot to /boot_
To: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@netbsd.org>
From: Jaromir Dolecek <dolecek@ics.muni.cz>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/30/1999 09:57:57
"Chris G. Demetriou" wrote:
> > Lets say CDFs are Right Out 9since they need symlinks). That leaves
> > /boot.${MACHINE}, or /boot_${MACHINE}.  Should first-stage bootblocks
> > check for that *before* /boot, or after?
> > Before sounds safer to me; any dissenters?
> 
> Before sounds right, and i think it should fit...

Is there any reason why the code should look for /boot at all ?

Jaromir