Subject: Re: renaming /boot to /boot_
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 09/30/1999 00:46:02
In message <37F30503.2C71ED2B@ics.muni.cz>Jaromir Dolecek writes
>"Chris G. Demetriou" wrote:
>> however, there's still the issue of consistency. There's no reason
>> the bootxx_* blocks should look for different secondaries
>So that booting off floppy using new bootlock with hard disk
>with old ones will work ?
Is this x86 or sparc? On other machines I use, if you boot from
floppy, you're gonna get the 2nd-stage bootblock from the floppy, not
the hard disk. Hm. Isnt that how i386 works, too?