Subject: Re: renaming /boot to /boot_
To: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@netbsd.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/29/1999 19:20:53
In message <871zbhi1rh.fsf@redmail.netbsd.org>,
Chris G. Demetriou writes:
>"approximately the same as for ffs."  it's the same directory
>lookup/symlink handling goop in both.

Directory lookup is needed regardless, and #ifdefing away symlink
support sounds reasonable to me: dont use symlinks to 2nd-stage
bootblocsk (installboot could check for that).  Is the problem that
the Alpha LFS bootblock was already so close to the edge of the cliff,
that looking into a /boot directory directory leaves it teetering on
the edge?