Subject: Re: partition bookkeeping
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 09/29/1999 11:30:44
>> I think the biggest lose with device majors and unit/partition
>> minors  is that I can't see how to do recursive partitioning,
> Oh, we do the recursive, find all the partitions trick of the wedge
> proposal, we just only asign them to the 64 minors for that drive.
(a) I can't see how this will work without recreating all the problems
of the dense-minor schemes in slightly different dress and (b) it
limits you to a max of 63 partitions per drive. (The latter seems like
infinity now, perhaps, but with drives pushing 100GB, I'm not at all
sure it'll stay that way.)
> Here's how I see recursive partitioning within the unit/partition
> First off, the only parttiioning scheme right now which supports
> recursive partitioning that I know of is mbr (which needs it as mbr
> only supports 4 partitions!).
Oh. Okay, I think we're talking about different things.
By "recursive partitioning" I mean that any partition can itself be
That's "any partition". Not "any MBR partition".
The most immediate need for this is dealing with MBRs. But installing
a solution that addresses only that need strikes me as extremely
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B