Subject: Re: Thoughts about wedges
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/29/1999 11:22:38
>> Admittedly, adding or removing drives is probably rarer than adding
>> or removing partitions. But is it really that much rarer?
> [...zip disk, eg...]
Heh. Good point. Thanks.
>> Another possibility [...]
>> mbr0 at wd0
>> msdosfs0 at mbr0 partition 0
>> bsdlabel0 at mbr0 partition 2
>> ffs0 at bsdlabel0 partition 0
> We could do that. :-) But the whole point of wedges was to get
> partition info out of the kernel. :-) Now we're having to put it in
> the kernel config files. :-(
No no. Just using the autoconf attachment machinery. I don't think
the person who first suggested this was actually proposing that you'd
actually write that in your kernel config; I'm certainly not. But we
already have userland tools that frob kernel device attachments to some
extent (scsictl and I think the PCMCIA stuff come to mind); this would
simply make wedgeconfig another such.
I'm not entirely sure I really like it. I, at least, am still at the
stage of playing with ideas to see what good can be gleaned from them.
der Mouse
mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B