On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Simon Burge wrote:
> > This is available as source, but who knows when things like StarOffice,
> > Quake and whatnot will start using that.
> 
> What I meant was that we have utime() at the binary compatibility level
> but not utime(2) (ie SYS_utime) at the source code level.  It's only
> that you're building from linux-specific source that's causing the
> problem.

I'm aware of this. Like I said above: what if someone hands you a linux
binary that uses that system call?


 - Hubert

-- 
NetBSD - Better for your uptime than Viagra