Subject: Re: linux: utime(2)
To: Hubert Feyrer <>
From: Simon Burge <simonb@NetBSD.ORG>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/07/1999 09:46:00
Hubert Feyrer wrote:

> On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Simon Burge wrote:
> > There's a linux_sys_utime() already - this sounds like a simple source
> > code fix...  What program?
> This is available as source, but who knows when things like StarOffice,
> Quake and whatnot will start using that.

What I meant was that we have utime() at the binary compatibility level
but not utime(2) (ie SYS_utime) at the source code level.  It's only
that you're building from linux-specific source that's causing the