Subject: Re: Linux emulation and not implemented syscalls
To: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 08/16/1999 16:44:41
In message <Pine.SOL.3.96.990816160747.27345Oemail@example.com>
Bill Studenmund writes:
>On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Jonathan Stone wrote:
>> even better, create a linux_nosys() which DTRT for Linux, and frob
>> mksyscalls.sh to add (optional) prefixing for UNIMPL syscalls, then
>> add a nosys-prefixing line to the Linux syscalls.conf to make it
>> emit linux_nosys() for UNIMPL syscalls, instead of nosys().
>We'd also need to catch off-the-table syscalls too (ones not listed in
>syscalls.conf but still unimplimented).
Which is already called via p_emul->e_nosys, iirc (at least on i386),
so no worries there.